Skip to content

Conversation

@pamaury
Copy link
Contributor

@pamaury pamaury commented Nov 20, 2025

Backport #26007 ([rom_ext] Update the ROM_EXT minor version). It is not entirely clear of backporting the minor version change is meaningful or not for master but since some tests or tooling might later depend on reading this version, I think it's safer to backport this.

Update the ROM_EXT minor version to `102`.  I'm using the offset 100 as
a starting point to distinguish A1 development ROM_EXTs from ES
development ROM_EXTs.

Signed-off-by: Chris Frantz <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 3667195)
@pamaury pamaury requested a review from cfrantz as a code owner November 20, 2025 19:54
@pamaury pamaury requested a review from jwnrt November 20, 2025 19:54
@cfrantz
Copy link
Contributor

cfrantz commented Dec 1, 2025

It is not entirely clear of backporting the minor version change is meaningful or not for master but since some tests or tooling might later depend on reading this version, I think it's safer to backport this.

I don't think we have anything that specifically depends on these version numbers, but I don't have a problem merging these over. At some point, I'd like to move to encoding the date into the minor version rather than an arbitrary number (You can fit a 10 digit number into a 32-bit integer, so one can encode something like YYYYMMDD_rcXX as YYYYMMDDXX into the minor version).

@pamaury pamaury added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 2, 2025
Merged via the queue into lowRISC:master with commit 221c100 Dec 2, 2025
45 of 47 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants