Skip to content

Conversation

@Abdulkbk
Copy link
Contributor

@Abdulkbk Abdulkbk commented Nov 3, 2025

Change Description

Fixes #10223

This PR fixes the issue where channels with no edge policies escape pruning even though they have been stale for a while.

The fix only affects native SQL backend see why.

In the PR, we modify the SQL query to return channels without an edge policy, and then we check the timestamp of the block that includes the channel's funding transaction to estimate its age and determine if it should be pruned.

Steps to Test

cd graph && go test  -run  TestIsZombieByAge
cd graph/db && go test -tags test_db_sqlite -run TestChanUpdatesInHorizonWithNoPolicies

In this commit we update `GetChannelsByPolicyLastUpdateRange` query
to return channels that have no policy. This is enables us to prune
staled channels that have never received a policy update.

To avoid premature deletion of chans, we will add another layer
of check to ensure that the chans with no policy are old ones.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @Abdulkbk, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves an issue where Lightning Network channels that never received an edge policy update were not being properly pruned as 'zombie' channels. The solution introduces a mechanism to determine the staleness of such channels by examining the timestamp of their funding block. This ensures that all inactive channels, regardless of their policy update status, are correctly identified and removed from the graph, leading to a more accurate and efficient network graph representation, specifically for the native SQL backend.

Highlights

  • Zombie Channel Pruning Logic: Introduced a new function, IsZombieByAge, to determine if a channel without any edge policies should be considered a 'zombie' based on the timestamp of its funding transaction's block. This addresses a specific issue where such channels were escaping the pruning process.
  • Integration into Pruning Process: The pruneZombieChans method has been updated to utilize the new IsZombieByAge logic for channels where both edge policies are absent. This ensures that stale channels lacking policy updates are now correctly identified and added to the list of channels to be pruned.
  • SQL Query Modification: The ChanUpdatesInHorizon SQL query was modified to explicitly include channels that have no associated edge policies (i.e., both last_update timestamps are NULL). This change is crucial for the SQL backend to correctly retrieve these channels for age-based zombie detection and pruning.
  • New Test Cases: Added TestIsZombieByAge to graph/builder_test.go to validate the new age-based zombie detection logic, and TestChanUpdatesInHorizonWithNoPolicies to graph/db/graph_test.go to ensure the SQL backend correctly returns channels without policies within various time horizons.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a fix for pruning zombie channels that have no edge policies. The approach of modifying the SQL query to include these channels and then checking their age based on the funding block's timestamp is sound. The new tests for IsZombieByAge and TestChanUpdatesInHorizonWithNoPolicies are well-written and cover the new functionality. However, I've identified a logical bug in pruneZombieChans that could lead to the incorrect pruning of valid channels that have no policies. My review includes a detailed comment and a suggested fix for this issue.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool, I think that works.

(cp1.last_update >= @start_time AND cp1.last_update < @end_time)
OR
(cp2.last_update >= @start_time AND cp2.last_update < @end_time)
-- TODO(abdulkbk): see the potential of adding a created_at to channel
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if we should limit this query since for example couple of nodes will have like >2000 of these cases, should be fine I think just thinking out loud.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it makes sense, especially when this change is run for the first time and the node has many stale channels with no policy. It should be fine for the next ticks (1-hour pruning intervals) tho.

checkIndexTimestamps()
}

// TestChanUpdatesInHorizonWithNoPolicies tests that we're able to properly
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add in the function header here as well that the kv backend does not handle the no-policy correctly or maybe creating a specific file which only runs if the sql tags on the file level are set ?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's do separate files, checked with elle.

In this commit we add TestChanUpdatesInHorizonWithNoPolicies to
test that we can query channels with no policy attached to it.
We also test that we can query channels with policies alongside
those without.
In this commit, we add a method to determine if a channel is a
zombie using the timestamp of the block of the funding trx that
opened the channel.
@Abdulkbk Abdulkbk force-pushed the zombie-chan-pruning branch from f8399e7 to c364eae Compare November 4, 2025 19:47
@Abdulkbk Abdulkbk requested a review from ziggie1984 November 5, 2025 21:41
@lightninglabs-deploy
Copy link

@ziggie1984: review reminder
@Abdulkbk, remember to re-request review from reviewers when ready

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[bug]: Zombie pruning skips channels that never emitted a channel update

3 participants