-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request for origin matching #121
Comments
Thanks, @phschafft. Are you volunteering or is this strictly a request? |
First of all it is a request and/or to see if there is a consensus that it will be in best interest for the module. I'm currently a bit busy, but if nobody else wants to take it I'm happy to have a look. |
Nobody has objected to a patch for this, but we're short on people power, so we'd need a PR with some rigorous tests to accompany it. |
Is there any specific request for a function name? Otherwise I would go with I would avoid a getter (only implement matching), as per RFC 6454 Section 4:
It is unclear/implementation specific what a "globally unique identifier"'s value is:
If there are no objects and time allows I would have a look at this the next days. |
This sounds like a good approach, @phschafft. |
It would be very nice to have a function similar to
eq()
performing same-origin matching. Such a feature could be used by other modules to calculate service boundaries, blacklisting, per-site settings etc.It is defined in RFC 6454 Section 4 and Section 5.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: