You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
group is a very heavy tactic (it imports ring to normalise exponents) which is no more powerful than simp [mul_assoc] in many cases appearing in practice. It might be useful to have a lightweight variant of group (in the sense that it doesn't import Field or even MonoidWithZero) for those numerous cases.
It looks like the implementation of group involves defining (implicitly) a simp-set. Would it not be possible to define the tactic and a partial simp-set that does not require ring, and add the ring-based lemmas to the Ring file and make them part of the group simp-set?
group
is a very heavy tactic (it importsring
to normalise exponents) which is no more powerful thansimp [mul_assoc]
in many cases appearing in practice. It might be useful to have a lightweight variant ofgroup
(in the sense that it doesn't importField
or evenMonoidWithZero
) for those numerous cases.Zulip
List of PRs removing uses of
group
:Ring
#21296The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: