You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I also added a table to the output, which contains mean PCC, median PCC and variance for each boxplot category (bwbw, bwwi, wiwi, wibw) and each round. This is the data I used for the cross-species delta PCC plots of the paper figure. Here's how the table looks like: Malus_domestica.sva.correlation_statistics.zip
Should I add these plots to csca output?
If it is OK like this, I'll push the update!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The style is a bit different from the figure I made for the paper since those plots were done in Python, but now the styles are consistent between the PCC and delta PCC plots.
Thank you! If "Group" refers to the sample_group column, using "Sample group" will make its meaning clearer. Some of the curate plots may still display legacy labels like "Organ", but they should now be updated to "Sample group" as well. Could you please make these corrections?
I added delta PCC to the AMALGKIT output as shown on the paper figure, like this:
uncorrected
Malus_domestica.2.correlation_cutoff.pdf
corrected
Malus_domestica.2.correlation_cutoff.sva.pdf
I also added a table to the output, which contains mean PCC, median PCC and variance for each boxplot category (bwbw, bwwi, wiwi, wibw) and each round. This is the data I used for the cross-species delta PCC plots of the paper figure. Here's how the table looks like:
Malus_domestica.sva.correlation_statistics.zip
Should I add these plots to
csca
output?If it is OK like this, I'll push the update!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: