-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to use for denoised audio (which is the 'clean' signal?) #1
Comments
Also, I've tested the algorithm on a bunch of different noisy files and I get numbers that vary wildly from 40 to 1000. There doesn't seem to be a kind of 'fixed' score (above 50, it's all unintelligible), it seems to be relative to the given file. Or am I doing something wrong? I was planning on using this to fade in a noisy signal when the denoised version made intelligibility poorer rather than better...but since it varies so much it's hard to pick a threshold ("Over 700, I'll start fading in the signal") because it's different for every new noisy file (since the noise varies and the denoising success varies). |
SIIB(y, x fs) is not identical to SIIB(x, y, fs) because SIIB performs on the vad region of the clean reference; Lines 97 to 100 in 226c2f3
I'm not sure what you mean. The
Actually, I just only ported this code from the author's one for my purpose. I recommend you ask the author deep questions. |
Ah! Thank you for answering.
Ah okay, sorry I meant that, let's say that:
In this case, the
Will do! Thank you so so much for your help! |
Hey! Thank you so much for making this super helpful library.
In the read me, the usage says:
My first question is:
SIIB(y, x fs)
as opposed toSIIB(x, y, fs)
?Thanks again! No pressure to respond if you don't have time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: