-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Differences between bedtools overlap / findOverlaps and findOverlapsOfPeaks #18
Comments
@csijcs Thank you for trying ChIPpeakAnno to annotate your data. I have trouble in understanding your question. Could you please show me the sample to explain your question? Here may be something you want read: https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/ChIPpeakAnno/inst/doc/FAQs.html#Find_Overlaps_of_Peaks |
Intersecting with bedtools: Using findOverlaps: Using findOverlapsOfPeaks: |
Could you share the image by following codes:
|
sorry, |
now try to run
and share me the number |
|
I think you figure it out the difference. Let me know if you still have any questions. |
Got it, thanks! |
Thanks for the great tool!
I'm a bit unclear why there is a difference between the number of overlapping peaks found by bedtools overlap and findOverlaps (which find the exact same number of overlapping peaks), and that of findOverlapsOfPeaks, which seems to with miss a few of the peaks or filter them out. I am just running the functions with default parameters. I have tried altering the connectedPeaks parameter, but still get the same number of overlapping peaks. Can you tell me why there are missing peaks and how I can recover them?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: