-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extreme Magenta Artifacts #196
Comments
Thanks for the link, in there it says that (2.0, 1.0, 1.4) is magenta which I find hard to understand. |
@fanckush if my understanding of this is correct: |
that makes a lot of sense. I tested in darktable to disable white balance and indeed the magenta turned into gray ( shade of white). I understand this now BUT it creates another problem for me that I don't get: |
I can answer part of that. The raw file's channels can saturate at different levels, and differ by ISO and also sometimes by aperture. That is why we measure the white levels and find a good level at which to clip: http://rawpedia.rawtherapee.com/Adding_Support_for_New_Raw_Formats#White_Levels The image is white-balanced somewhere in the pipeline: http://rawpedia.rawtherapee.com/Toolchain_Pipeline |
A v0.6 exists? ... Apparently not for Windows? |
v0.6 does not exist yet... Apologies for the delay, I'm 90% there, just need to find time for the last 10% of the work. |
so i needed some new HDR samples for some bugfixes i'm working on and here's what i got:
LEFT: V0.6 the highlights are simply magenta/purple and nothing can done about it
RIGHT: V0.5 better than 0.6 but there is a magenta tint all in the highlights
What i'd like to know is why magenta? what is the technical reason behind it?
files can be found here https://gofile.io/?c=QBkfj6
shot on: a6300 + 10-18mm
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: