-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Enhancement: Type hinting improvements #13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
|
Since Idea:
|
Idea:
|
Idea: (EDIT: This is Python >=3.8 only 😭)
|
I don't know if you saw, but I pulled out a lot of my own number typing work-arounds into their own package called |
@jamesohortle the code as it stands is a strong improvement to the codebase. I'm happy for you to merge into the dev branch now, and put those TODO items in an issue for enhancement in the future.
Also, the
None
states have a big structural importance: they serve as the pseudo 'aggregate' state, which represents the infinity of states which are not observed in the model's current state. We can't replace them completely, but maybe we can make a reserved state label so avoid the type conflicts.Originally posted by @jamesross2 in #10 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: