Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add support for proposed 3.17 APIs #20

Closed
1 of 19 tasks
baronfel opened this issue May 1, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
1 of 19 tasks

Add support for proposed 3.17 APIs #20

baronfel opened this issue May 1, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@baronfel
Copy link
Contributor

baronfel commented May 1, 2022 •
edited
Loading

3.17 adds APIs for the following features:

  • Specify how clients will handle stale requests.
  • Add support for a completion item label details.
  • Add support for workspace symbol resolve request.
  • Add support for label details and insert text mode on completion items.
  • Add support for shared values on CompletionItemList.
  • Add support for HTML tags in Markdown.
  • Add support for collapsed text in folding.
  • Add support for trigger kinds on code action requests.
  • Add the following support to semantic tokens:
  • server cancelable
  • augmentation of syntax tokens
  • Add support to negotiate the position encoding.
  • Add support for HTML tags in markdown.
  • Add support for relative patterns in file watchers.
  • Add support for type hierarchies
  • Add support for inline values.
  • Add support for inlay hints.
  • Add support for notebook documents.
  • Add support for diagnostic pull model.

We should add our side to match.
@TheAngryByrd
Copy link
Member

#52 covers a lot of these.

@TheAngryByrd
Copy link
Member

with #49 and #67 I'm going to close this. Anything that isn't covered by those PRs should open a new issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@baronfel @TheAngryByrd