Mean CPU usage for Haskell and Rust agree to approximately 15%

[bwbush]

Observation

• Mean CPU load differs between the Haskell and Rust simulations, often by about 15%.
• Sometimes one is more heavily loaded and other times the other is more heavily loaded.
• Is this quality of agreement sufficient?

Evidence

Context

• Tag: leios-2025w11
• Network topo-default-100
• Base configuration: config.default.yaml
• Variation on base configuration:

  ouroboros-leios/analysis/sims/2025w11/run-experiment.sh

  Lines 78 to 80 in f78f1dc

  	STAGE_LENGTHS="20 40 60"
  	IB_RATES="0.1 0.3 1.0 3.0 10.0 30.0"
  	IB_SIZES="32768 65536 98304 131072 163840"

[Quantumplation]

How hard would it be to match up colors between these graphs?

[bwbush]

How hard would it be to match up colors between these graphs?
Yes, I'll do that and maybe also generate a correspondence table.

[bwbush]

Here are the colors (mostly) matched, at tag leios-2025w12. We still see discrepancies, so I'm going to dig into the log files.

[Saizan]

Btw, one difference is that Haskell is not breaking up e.g. certification handling into per-vote subtasks that can be parallelized. All of the labels listed are one sequential task each.