Compact Version or way to hide

[SeaPlusPlush]

Hello,

When my workspace uses dicebot for public stat rolling, it really clogs up our channel (see below image). While I love the breakout, it adds quite a lot of clutter and I can't figure out how to remove or hide the dicebot messages (maybe there are ways but FYI I'm not an admin).

Anyway, I was wondering if there were a way for rolls like this to be compacted.

For instance, maybe running the command from the pic below (with an additional keyword)...

/roll compact 4d6k3 for Stat1, 4d6k3 for Stat2, 4d6k3 for Stat3, 4d6k3 for Stat4, 4d6k3 for Stat45, 4d6k3 for Stat6

...has the following result:

@.Person rolled 12 for Stat1 +7 for Stat2 +13 for Stat3 +11 for Stat4 16 for Stat5 +14 for Stat6 = 73
(Dice: 4d6)(Keep: 3)(Rolls: 3 4 5)(Removed: 1) Total = 12
(Dice: 4d6)(Keep: 3)(Rolls: 1 1 5)(Removed: 1) Total = 7
(Dice: 4d6)(Keep: 3)(Rolls: 4 4 5)(Removed: 3) Total = 13
(Dice: 4d6)(Keep: 3)(Rolls: 2 3 6)(Removed: 2) Total = 11
(Dice: 4d6)(Keep: 3)(Rolls: 4 6 6)(Removed: 2) Total = 16
(Dice: 4d6)(Keep: 3)(Rolls: 2 6 6)(Removed: 1) Total = 14

Currently this is the result, imagine 6-8 of these in your channel 😱

[arkie]

@SeaPlusPlush reopen if /roll mini 4d6k3 for Stat1, 4d6k3 for Stat2, 4d6k3 for Stat3, 4d6k3 for Stat4, 4d6k3 for Stat45, 4d6k3 for Stat6 doesn't work for you 👍

[SeaPlusPlush]

Wow, thanks for the super quick response. This is so much better, but there is a tiny problem in that it removes knowledge of what was being rolled from the dicebot (which cannot be edited or removed)

A user could do something like use a 6d6k3

And then edit it to look like it was 4d6k3

Yes there is an edit tag when doing so, but it might not be super apparent when checking a lot of peoples stuff (or if they are deleting their messages). I feel as though having an "impartial" way to confirm what was rolled is needed.

Also @arkie I cannot seem to reopen this issue.

[SeaPlusPlush]

Hello @arkie, I was wondering if you have had a chance to look at this again?

[arkie]

I feel like a proper fix would be to allow more customization in output instead of the present logic, where mini is checked as the prefix of the roll string and passed as a bool to the formatter which just removes the fields that would have been attached.

Definitely would probably be a good area to improve, but probably will not get a chance to do so in the near future.