-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unexpected kicost behavior: Wrong mouser part for correct part number #566
Comments
Hi @gituser789 ! Lamentably I can't reproduce it, I get: I see you don't have a price for it, do you have a Mouser key? |
Hi @set-soft, yes, mouser key is available, see here the screenshot from an unshortened list Seems like not showing prices when the device is non-stock. Just checked the file I uploaded again (by downloading my own uploaded file): Still the same result, shows two different material numbers. python: |
I mean the key to access Mouser API in the KiCost config.yaml file. Not the part number for Mouser. |
I have deleted the cache by clearing this folder: |
Issue / Problem report
Kicost picks a wrong part number, giving a correct part number in it. I have attached the example xml-file (with only one component).
Inside the xml-file, the correct mouser part number
538-53398-0871
appears, but kicost picks538-53398-0890
via mouser api. I can not detect any failure in the xml file, as the wrong part number does not exist there. Themouser#
field is filled correctly (see attached file). I am using kicost since a while, never hat issues like that. What did i miss? Is the failure inside the mouser API?LCB-CBB-01.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: