Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Request for removal of dmamontov/hass-ledfx #3257

Closed
4 tasks done
PolestarWx opened this issue Sep 13, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed
4 tasks done

Request for removal of dmamontov/hass-ledfx #3257

PolestarWx opened this issue Sep 13, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
@ludeeus
Labels
flag Flagging of repository that should be removed from HACS

Comments

@PolestarWx
Copy link

Repository

dmamontov/hass-ledfx

Checklist

  • I understand that this form should only be used for repositories that needs to be removed from HACS
  • I understand that a bug is not reason enough to have a repository removed
  • The repository is currently shipped as a default repository in HACS
  • I have tried to get the authors attention to the reason for removal

Why should this be removed?

Does not work anymore, the integration occur error and none of the button are working.

Link to issue

dmamontov/hass-ledfx#21
@PolestarWx PolestarWx added the flag Flagging of repository that should be removed from HACS label Sep 13, 2023
@PolestarWx PolestarWx mentioned this issue Sep 13, 2023
Open
@frostworx frostworx mentioned this issue Sep 25, 2023
Closed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 8, 2023
bramstroker pushed a commit to bramstroker/default that referenced this issue Dec 21, 2024
@ludeeus @bramstroker
Remove dmamontov/hass-ledfx
01bc69f 
Closes hacs/integration#3257
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@ludeeus ludeeus

Labels
flag Flagging of repository that should be removed from HACS
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ludeeus @PolestarWx