Skip to content

Any comment about upcoming Git Rev News edition 122 #767

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
chriscool opened this issue Apr 1, 2025 · 9 comments
Open

Any comment about upcoming Git Rev News edition 122 #767

chriscool opened this issue Apr 1, 2025 · 9 comments

Comments

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator

A currently mostly empty draft will be there soon:

https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-122.md

Feel free to comment in this issue, suggest topics, suggest persons to interview, or use the edit button (that looks like a pen) to edit and create a pull request with the changes you would like.

Let's try to publish this edition around the end of April 2025!

This will also be a special edition as we will celebrate !!!20 years of Git!!! as Git was first released on April 2015 by Linus.

Thanks!

cc @jnareb @mjaix @sivaraam @gitster @stepnem

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Any idea about what we could do for this special "20 years of Git" edition?

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

chriscool commented Apr 2, 2025

Here is an idea: instead of writing articles about recent discussions, maybe we could write a few articles about discussions that happened 20 years ago soon after Git was initially released by Linus?

We could also maybe have links to articles about Git written around 20 years ago. It might be hard to find those articles though.

@jnareb
Copy link
Member

jnareb commented Apr 3, 2025

I have watched how Git was being created by reading KernelTraffic (and the only edition of GitTraffic), but the site is defunct now; even if homepage still works, the archive does not. IIRC.

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It looks like old conversations on the Git mailing list, like https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/, are available on lore.kernel.org/git though. So at least, writing articles about discussions that happened 20 years ago is still possible.

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Link suggestion: https://github.com/lucasoshiro/oshit

@sivaraam
Copy link
Member

sivaraam commented Apr 6, 2025

On the interview front, I wonder if it would make any sense to do some kind of community interview where we prepare a specific set of questions for the 20th anniversary. Or more like a community discussion. I'm not yet sure about what the discussion about. I suppose it might cover a variety of topics past and future. May be we could have questions like:

  • What's your favorite Git trick or workflow that you wish more people knew about?
  • What was your worst Git disaster, and how did you recover from it?
  • If you could go back in time and change one design decision in Git, what would it be?
  • Which Git feature or improvement over the past 20 years do you think had the biggest impact on your workflow?
  • What Git problem that existed 10 years ago has been most successfully solved?
  • Which Git commands or workflows do you think are still misunderstood or underutilized today?

I'm also unsure if this would be interesting to pursue and/or relevant to this edition. Kindly share your thoughts.


The discussions going on the 20th-anniversary discord channel [ref] are also interesting. May be we could do an article based out of it?

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The discussions going on the 20th-anniversary discord channel [ref] are also interesting. May be we could do an article based out of it?

Yeah, good idea!

And maybe we could ask the questions you suggest on the discord channel.

@To1ne
Copy link

To1ne commented Apr 10, 2025

I just stumbled upon https://devlands.com/ a game about Git. There's more context about it at https://initialcommit.com/blog/im-making-a-git-game

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @To1ne for the suggestion!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants