-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 230
Open
Copy link
Labels
area:setupRelated to conductor:setup commandRelated to conductor:setup commanddiscussionProposals or architectural changes that require consensus or further research.Proposals or architectural changes that require consensus or further research.p1High priority. Must be fixed in the upcoming releaseHigh priority. Must be fixed in the upcoming release
Description
Problem Description
The current setup.toml command relies on a brittle setup_state.json file to manage setup progress and state. This approach has several drawbacks:
- If the JSON file is deleted or out of sync, the setup process gets confused, forcing users to restart or manually patch the state.
- Writing to and reading from a state file frequently wastes tokens and adds unnecessary file-writing tool calls.
Expected Behavior
Instead of a state file, the agent should perform an artifact audit by checking the physical presence of artifacts (like product.md, tech-stack.md, workflow.md, index.md, and tracks/), the agent can deterministically map the project state and seamlessly resume setup.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
area:setupRelated to conductor:setup commandRelated to conductor:setup commanddiscussionProposals or architectural changes that require consensus or further research.Proposals or architectural changes that require consensus or further research.p1High priority. Must be fixed in the upcoming releaseHigh priority. Must be fixed in the upcoming release