Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add concepts to preservation type vocabulary? #154

Open
CecSve opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Add concepts to preservation type vocabulary? #154

CecSve opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
GRSciColl Terms or vocabularies relevant for GRSciColl

Comments

@CecSve
Copy link
Collaborator

CecSve commented Sep 18, 2024

The current preservationType vocabulary does not contain many of the terms recommended by Latimer Core, e.g. the Arctos vocabulary.

Should the concepts be added to the list of the GBIF vocabulary? The tricky part will be reconciling the concepts between vocabularies (add sameAsURIS for already existing concepts so mapping is not lost) and remap data.
@CecSve CecSve added the GRSciColl Terms or vocabularies relevant for GRSciColl label Sep 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
GRSciColl Terms or vocabularies relevant for GRSciColl
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@CecSve