Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Privacy site measurements #254

Open
MortenHofft opened this issue Feb 10, 2023 · 7 comments
Open

Privacy site measurements #254

MortenHofft opened this issue Feb 10, 2023 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
Impact: Critical Drop everything and fix this Section: Theme Would require changes in the base theme

Comments

@MortenHofft
Copy link
Member

Add instructions for using e.g. Plausible
And possible inform participants abou the new EU laws that impact the use of e.g. Google Analytics

@MortenHofft MortenHofft added Section: Theme Would require changes in the base theme Impact: Critical Drop everything and fix this labels Feb 10, 2023
@MortenHofft MortenHofft self-assigned this Feb 10, 2023
@MortenHofft
Copy link
Member Author

@sformel-usgs
Copy link

There is some confusion in the GBIF North America region over whether or not Google Analytics are permissible for portals that are hosted on GBIF servers in Denmark. In #16 it seems like Google analytics might be acceptable under certain circumstances, but I had heard from Abby Benson that this was not the case.

Since #16 is a bit old, and both of these issues are still open, would you mind trying to summarize where we stand with using Google Analytics on hosted portals? Tagging @dbloom for awareness.

@MortenHofft
Copy link
Member Author

I'll defer to @MattBlissett and @kcopas on that.

@kcopas
Copy link
Member

kcopas commented Nov 15, 2024

The issues were with Google Universal Analytics. The changes and customization available through Google Analytics 4 appear* to enable it to be run in compliance in Denmark, provided that site owner:

  1. Enables explicit or opt-in consent
  2. Uses "Google Consent Mode"
  3. Has a detailed privacy policy and cookie policy
  4. Enters into a Data Processing Agreement with Google
  • not legal advice

@sformel-usgs
Copy link

Thanks @kcopas! At the end of the day, GA would be a convenience for us to learn about our portal users, but I want to ensure that I don't put GBIF in a bad light as the host of our portal. I will look into this a bit more. If I decide to implement GA, I will share my plan before I do anything to make sure I haven't misinterpreted anything.

@timrobertson100
Copy link
Member

Hi @sformel-usgs
If you also want to explore what Plausible looks like, here is the one for GBIF.org: https://plausible.io/gbif.org
It is also an easy option instead of GA, and might give you what you need.

@sformel-usgs
Copy link

Thanks @timrobertson100. I had explored that option, and Plausible seems like a good service, but it's a bit more complicated than that on my end. USGS uses GA and isn't willing to pay for Plausible as a new service. I'm going to see what I can do with GA.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Impact: Critical Drop everything and fix this Section: Theme Would require changes in the base theme
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants