-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
feat(blog): Add new blog featuring adoption of in-place Pod resource updates
#976
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
6239e0f
3b71e72
6588dd3
f5d4ada
3c85e3c
efc8ed4
87b0c8b
ab2ed11
eedb079
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| title: Adoption of In-Place Pod Resource Updates in Gardener | ||
| linkTitle: Adoption of In-Place Pod Resource Updates in Gardener | ||
| newsSubtitle: May 19, 2026 | ||
| publishdate: 2026-05-19 | ||
| authors: | ||
| - avatar: https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/vitanovs | ||
| login: vitanovs | ||
| name: Stoyan Vitanov | ||
| aliases: [/blog/2026/05/19/in-place-pod-resource-updates] | ||
| tags: | ||
| - autoscaling | ||
| - vpa | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| As Kubernetes workloads evolve, the need for dynamic resource adjustments becomes increasingly critical. Traditional `Pod` resource updates require `Pod` recreation, leading to increased operational costs and potential service disruptions. | ||
| To address this shortcoming, Kubernetes introduced a new way of updating `Pod` resources _in-place_, without the need to _evict_ workloads in order to apply the configuration change. With the [v1.27](https://kubernetes.io/releases/1.27/) release, a new `resize` subresource got introduced to the `Pod`'s API, acting as an interface to the underlying CRI implementations that manage the _cgroups_ settings. | ||
|
|
||
| ## What are the key benefits of _in-place_ Pod resource updates? | ||
|
|
||
| Having the ability to bypass the rollout process when updating `Pod` resources drastically improves the scaling efficiency. Eliminating the overhead of `Pod` scheduling and application initialization is among the primary benefits of the new _update_ mechanism. The following points summarize the key factors when considering using _in-place_ updates: | ||
|
|
||
| - __Zero-downtime scaling__: Resources are adjusted without `Pod` recreation or service interruption | ||
| - __Reduced scheduling overhead__: No need to re-schedule `Pod`s across the cluster | ||
| - __Reduced initialization overhead__: Applications __do not__ go through full initialization all over again | ||
| - __Preserved `Pod` identity__: `Pod` names, IPs, and volumes remain unchanged | ||
| - __Improved resource efficiency__: More granular and responsive resource optimization | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. One more strong benefit is the following. Not all workload can gracefully handle restarts/evictions due to bugs or limitations. IMO, we should link issues we were facing that were caused by such evictions. |
||
|
|
||
| To read more about the feature, refer to the official [documentation](https://kubernetes.io/blog/2025/12/19/kubernetes-v1-35-in-place-pod-resize-ga/). | ||
|
|
||
| ## How does Gardener utilize the new _update_ mechanism? | ||
|
|
||
| Gardener relies heavily on the [Vertical Pod Autoscaler](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler) to advance the resource usage optimization and keep the _out-of-the-box_ components running as efficiently as possible. With the [v1.4.0](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/releases/tag/vertical-pod-autoscaler-1.4.0) release, Vertical Pod Autoscaler introduced the ability to configure a new `.spec.updatePolicy.updateMode` for the `VerticalPodAutoscaler` resources: | ||
|
|
||
| ```yaml | ||
| apiVersion: autoscaling.k8s.io/v1 | ||
| kind: VerticalPodAutoscaler | ||
| metadata: | ||
| name: demo-vpa | ||
| spec: | ||
| targetRef: | ||
| apiVersion: "apps/v1" | ||
| kind: Deployment | ||
| name: demo | ||
| updatePolicy: | ||
| updateMode: "InPlaceOrRecreate" | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| effectively performing _in-place_ resource updates and _falling back_ to _eviction_ in case of failure. Adopting this release created the opportunity to leverage the new _update_ mechanism, and with Gardener [v1.137](https://github.com/gardener/gardener/releases/tag/v1.137.0), a new automatic migration mechanism was introduced. | ||
|
|
||
| Historically, `VerticalPodAutoscaler` resources, created for the different Gardener components, were configured to use _update mode_ `Auto` as it was the default option that mimics the behavior of `Recreate` - _evicting_ `Pod`s to apply newly [calculated resource recommendations](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/vertical-pod-autoscaler/docs/components.md#implementation-of-the-recommender). The subsequent Vertical Pod Autoscaler [v1.5.0](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/releases/tag/vertical-pod-autoscaler-1.5.0) release deprecated the `Auto` _update mode_, leaving only two viable options for continuous scaling: `Recreate` and `InPlaceOrRecreate`. The following graph illustrates the _flow_ of `Pod` resource updates used in Gardener: | ||
|
|
||
| ```mermaid | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @klocke-io , does netlify support mermaid? I see that mermaid is NOT properly displayed in the website: https://gardener.cloud/contribute/documentation/shortcodes/#shortcodes. It seems that Hugo was supporting mermaid and the above documentation mentions Hugo. cc @JordanJordanov - this seems to be yet another regression in the website/documentation topic. cc @VelmiraS @vitanovs , we could usage image instead as I don't think mermaid is supported anymore by the website.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @ialidzhikov, thanks for pointing that out! The website now supports Mermaid diagrams: #981. |
||
| graph LR | ||
| A[VPA Recommender] -->|new recommendation| B[VPA Updater] | ||
| B -->|PATCH /resize subresource| C[API Server] | ||
| C -->|sends update request| D[Kubelet] | ||
| D -->|sends update request| E[CRI Runtime] | ||
| E -->|updates cgroups| F[Running Container] | ||
| F -->|updates status| D | ||
| D -->|updates Pod status| C | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| The _key_ functionality behind this improved resource management is Linux [cgroups](https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/cgroups.7.html), which are responsible for grouping processes and limiting the host resources they can utilize. | ||
|
|
||
| ### How are `VerticalPodAutoscaler` resources configured? | ||
|
|
||
| Like any cluster-wide configuration change, migrating the `VerticalPodAutoscaler` resources' _update mode_ presented a unique challenge that solved this by leveraging the [Gardener Resource Manager](https://github.com/gardener/gardener/blob/master/docs/concepts/resource-manager.md) and its extensible architecture. | ||
|
|
||
| We developed a dedicated `MutatingWebhook` that automatically filters relevant `VerticalPodAutoscaler` resources and applies the _update mode_ change, making the migration seamless. The webhook is deployed through the `VPAInPlaceUpdates` _feature gate_ (available in both `gardenlet` and [Gardener Operator](https://github.com/gardener/gardener/blob/master/docs/concepts/operator.md)). | ||
| We also built a _rollback_ mechanism to ensure safety—if the feature gate is disabled, migration scripts automatically revert the _update mode_ changes during `gardenlet` or `operator` initialization. These changes have been available since Gardener [v1.137](https://github.com/gardener/gardener/releases/tag/v1.137.0), making _in-place_ update mode adoption fully operational and ready for production use. | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "Migration scripts automatically revert…during initialization" — calling them "scripts" undersells what's happening; this is reconciliation logic in gardenlet/operator startup. Consider: "the gardenlet / operator initialization logic automatically reverts the update mode." |
||
|
|
||
| For detailed information on [usage](https://github.com/gardener/gardener/blob/master/docs/usage/autoscaling/in-place-resource-updates.md) and [enablement](https://github.com/gardener/gardener/blob/master/docs/operations/enabling-in-place-resource-updates.md), refer to the official documentation. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Monitoring | ||
|
|
||
| Performing configuration migrations can become an exhausting task without a convenient dashboard to evaluate the process state. For this reason, as part of the effort to support _in-place_ Pod resource updates, we introduced a brand new _dashboard_ for the `vpa-updater` component. | ||
|
|
||
|  | ||
|
|
||
| With sections covering `VerticalPodAutoscaler` resource overviews (segregated by _update mode_) and panels displaying success rates per resource, the new dashboard can be used for both monitoring and generating status reports on applied resource recommendations. | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We could add a section with the achievements on our side. We together checked with you that in dev environments 90% of the Pod evictions were replaced with in-place updates. |
||
|
|
||
| ## References | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Limitations are unmentioned. The post is upbeat about benefits but says nothing about what |
||
|
|
||
| The following list of references can be used for further reading and technical deep dives into the topic. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Kubernetes Documentation | ||
|
|
||
| - [In-Place Pod Resize (GA in v1.35)](https://kubernetes.io/blog/2025/12/19/kubernetes-v1-35-in-place-pod-resize-ga/) | ||
| - [Resize Container Resources](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/resize-container-resources/) | ||
| - [Pod v1 API Reference - resize subresource](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/kubernetes-api/workload-resources/pod-v1/#operations-pod-v1-resize) | ||
|
|
||
| ### Vertical Pod Autoscaler | ||
|
|
||
| - [VPA v1.4.0 Release Notes](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/releases/tag/vertical-pod-autoscaler-1.4.0) (introduced InPlaceOrRecreate) | ||
| - [VPA v1.5.0 Release Notes](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/releases/tag/vertical-pod-autoscaler-1.5.0) (deprecated Auto mode) | ||
| - [VPA In-Place Updates Documentation](https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/vertical-pod-autoscaler/docs/features.md#in-place-updates-inplaceorrecreate) | ||
|
|
||
| ### Gardener Documentation | ||
|
|
||
| - [Usage: In-Place Resource Updates](https://github.com/gardener/gardener/blob/master/docs/usage/autoscaling/in-place-resource-updates.md) | ||
| - [Operations: Enabling In-Place Resource Updates](https://github.com/gardener/gardener/blob/master/docs/operations/enabling-in-place-resource-updates.md) | ||
| - [Gardener Resource Manager](https://github.com/gardener/gardener/blob/master/docs/concepts/resource-manager.md) | ||
| - [Gardener v1.137.0 Release Notes](https://github.com/gardener/gardener/releases/tag/v1.137.0) | ||
|
|
||
| ### Technical Deep Dives | ||
|
|
||
| - [Linux cgroups v2](https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.html) | ||
| - [CRI (Container Runtime Interface) Specification](https://github.com/kubernetes/cri-api) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here, we could make it stronger by explaining the components in Gardener which have downtime with Pod evictions: