Replies: 1 comment
-
Varlink has been adopted by systemd in swaths of their codebase, and it being simpler and introspectable without special tools is a nice bonus. It's also bus-less, which I like. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Expected Behavior
When dealing with alternative implementations of the Flatpak launcher a second dbus daemon overhead (xdg-dbus-proxy) limits the freedom of implementation. Varlink specs can give more freedom to approach the implementation. This feature has been asked before: https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2019/10/03/some-flatpak-updates/#comment-20194
Current Behavior
Currently Flatpak doesn't have support for Varlink specs.
Anything else we should know?
(Didn't find any flag to ask for this feature, so sorry to do it using a bug report.)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions