Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[firebase_ui_auth] Move away from dynamic links usage #7

Open
iKK001 opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 10 comments
Open

[firebase_ui_auth] Move away from dynamic links usage #7

iKK001 opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 10 comments
Labels
auth Keep Open Keep PR or issue open

Comments

@iKK001
Copy link

iKK001 commented Aug 17, 2023

The flutterfire package firebase_auth_ui_login uses dynamic links.

However, the dynamic links will be shut down as stated in the official Google documentation here

Any plans on when you update your package to mitigate this deprecation ??

Is there any replacement that I can add in your firebase_auth_ui_login package ?

What will happen to all the many Flutter packages that incorporate dynamic links ?

@danagbemava-nc
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @iKK001, I think for now, you can continue to use dynamic links until 2025. The UI packages will need to be eventually migrated from dynamic links. Labeling for further insight from the team.

cc @lesnitsky

@lesnitsky
Copy link
Member

The referenced package is not maintained by us :) Although this is valid for our auth packages as well.

@iKK001
Copy link
Author

iKK001 commented Aug 17, 2023

Thanks, I do certainly NOT want to implement anything that is deprecated in 2025 already.

In the meantime I hope Flutter can keep up all the dynamic-link mess eventually.

A good way could be if your packages have the dynamic links OPTIONAL. Email-verification without dynamic links would then, for example, wait on a timer until the user.isVerified becomes true...

@lesnitsky lesnitsky transferred this issue from firebase/flutterfire Aug 18, 2023
@darshankawar darshankawar added good first issue Good for newcomers and removed good first issue Good for newcomers labels Aug 22, 2023
@danagbemava-nc danagbemava-nc changed the title Dynamic Links no longer supported [firebase_ui_auth] Move away from dynamic links usage Oct 4, 2023
@QuentinSc
Copy link

QuentinSc commented Feb 6, 2024

Hello, anyway to keep Firebase UI for magic link but not dynamic links ?

@Levi-Lesches
Copy link

Hi, just pointing out that dynamic links will stop being functional in just a few weeks. package:firebase_auth stopped using it, and now this package is the only user of firebase_dynamic_links in my project. Is there a timeline for when this will be removed, or steps needed to safely remove it? Perhaps I can help with a PR if you could point me in a direction

@Lyokone
Copy link
Contributor

Lyokone commented Aug 2, 2024

Hello @Levi-Lesches, the official depreciation date is August 2025 as noted here: https://firebase.google.com/docs/dynamic-links

We will remove it close to this timeline but will add depreciation warnings to the UI library.

@Levi-Lesches
Copy link

Sorry, I read it as 2024 and got concerned. Sounds good :)

Copy link

Hello 👋, to help manage issues we automatically close stale issues.

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity for quite some time. Has this issue been fixed, or does it still require attention?

This issue will be closed in 15 days if no further activity occurs.

Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale Issue with no recent activity label Nov 12, 2024
@EnduringBeta
Copy link
Contributor

This does need fixing.

@russellwheatley russellwheatley added Keep Open Keep PR or issue open and removed Stale Issue with no recent activity labels Nov 12, 2024
@LaiZhou
Copy link

LaiZhou commented Mar 7, 2025

Any updates ? we need a new way to support email link sign in.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
auth Keep Open Keep PR or issue open
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants