You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Microbenchmarks on my laptop now show that TLSSlot::with is just as fast (2 ns/op) as the alloc_tls_fast_with! macro. If memory serves, these microbenchmarks used to show (on this same model of laptop) that TLSSlot::with took 4 ns/op. Thus, it's worth looking into whether elfmalloc's macrobenchmarks no longer show a difference in speed between TLSSlot::with and alloc_tls_fast_with!, and if so, to consider removing the latter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Microbenchmarks on my laptop now show that
TLSSlot::with
is just as fast (2 ns/op) as thealloc_tls_fast_with!
macro. If memory serves, these microbenchmarks used to show (on this same model of laptop) thatTLSSlot::with
took 4 ns/op. Thus, it's worth looking into whetherelfmalloc
's macrobenchmarks no longer show a difference in speed betweenTLSSlot::with
andalloc_tls_fast_with!
, and if so, to consider removing the latter.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: