Replies: 1 comment
-
One idea I had was to set the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
First off, thank you for the amazing work on the protobuf library. I know this has been asked a couple of times in the org and made clear that there wouldn't be built in support. So, I'm trying to transparently use
DateTime
in place ofgoogle.protobuf.Timestamp
via a transform module like mentioned in this issue. I currently have a functioning implementation that passes very basic tests.It's ugly, but it works (so far).
My biggest problem is that while the data will be a
DateTime
struct, all of the generated code still referencesGoogle.Protobuf.Timestamp
, so typespecs will be incorrect. Is there any way to fix this, or a better way to go about this?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions