Skip to content

How should dehydrated devices be shown to the user? #4269

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
reivilibre opened this issue Mar 19, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

How should dehydrated devices be shown to the user? #4269

reivilibre opened this issue Mar 19, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@reivilibre
Copy link
Contributor

reivilibre commented Mar 19, 2025

Dehydrated devices are a little bit different from a normal device, that they might warrant special treatment.

But hiding from the user does not seem like the optimal solution, because having a dehydrated device on your account that you're not aware of, is a potential security concern.

See also: element-hq/element-web#29264

@mxandreas
Copy link

mxandreas commented Mar 24, 2025

@reivilibre @dkasak We're discussing just now how to show the offline/dehydrated device in EW. Current winning idea seems to be to show it somewhere under the Encryption settings (as it is really there because of E2EE), rather than a specially decorated device/session. But there are some pros and cons to both approaches.

First question is - as the client(s) have to show this information anyway, because MAS may not be used, does MAS actually have to show it at all.

If MAS has to show this, then the issue is that MAS probably has no better place than to present this as a specially decorated device, which may create inconsistency with where the client shows it.

cc: @richvdh @americanrefugee

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants