You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am very intrigued by the ideas proposed in this project and the papers motivating this study. I tried simulating the evolution for 1000 Ma (1 billion years) and found some issues with the software implementation.
While the simulation works with 100 million years & 1 million years per timestep, the simulation doesn't work with 1,000 years & 1 million years per timestep as well as with 100 million years & 10 million years per timestep. Incidentally, 10 million years & 0.01 million years per timestep works. Do you know what is the cause behind this? There is no error message in the R console. All results are displayed below.
I initially thought that the issue stemmed from too many steps in the simulation. Instead, it may be due to the (mis-)estimation of simulated values which breaks the simulation. This is because, with 100 million years & 10 million years per timestep, one would expect it to work if the issue was due to too many steps in the simulation. Using the same number of steps 10 million years & 0.01 million years per timestep (i.e. 10/0.01 = 1000 = 1000/1 from 1,000 years & 1 million years per timestep), the simulation works.
100 million years, 1 million years per timestep [works]
Dear all,
I am very intrigued by the ideas proposed in this project and the papers motivating this study. I tried simulating the evolution for 1000 Ma (1 billion years) and found some issues with the software implementation.
While the simulation works with 100 million years & 1 million years per timestep, the simulation doesn't work with 1,000 years & 1 million years per timestep as well as with 100 million years & 10 million years per timestep. Incidentally, 10 million years & 0.01 million years per timestep works. Do you know what is the cause behind this? There is no error message in the R console. All results are displayed below.
I initially thought that the issue stemmed from too many steps in the simulation. Instead, it may be due to the (mis-)estimation of simulated values which breaks the simulation. This is because, with 100 million years & 10 million years per timestep, one would expect it to work if the issue was due to too many steps in the simulation. Using the same number of steps 10 million years & 0.01 million years per timestep (i.e. 10/0.01 = 1000 = 1000/1 from 1,000 years & 1 million years per timestep), the simulation works.
100 million years, 1 million years per timestep [works]
1,000 million years, 1 million years per timestep [doesn't work]
100 million years, 10 million years per timestep [doesn't work]
10 million years, 0.01 million years per timestep [works]
Best,
Sodai
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: