You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for developing ENVI, I think it's a really promising tool!
Nevertheless, I have tried out the first version of ENVI with Tensorflow, and the UMAP in the latent space looked quite good (see image attached). However, when plotting the UMAP in the latent space with exactly the same dataset (single-cell RNA-seq and MERSCOPE), the UMAP in the latent space is not really convincing, as the cell-types are barely overlapping.
What do you think could be causing the issue?
Thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good day! I am having the same problem as @rmathieu25. The new version does not give overlapping dimensional reduction between scRNA and ST. Do you have any insights why this is occurring?
In addition to this issue, I also noticed that the imputed genes are only a fraction of the genes in the SC reference. Do you know if this behavior is expected?
Hello,
Thank you for developing ENVI, I think it's a really promising tool!
Nevertheless, I have tried out the first version of ENVI with Tensorflow, and the UMAP in the latent space looked quite good (see image attached). However, when plotting the UMAP in the latent space with exactly the same dataset (single-cell RNA-seq and MERSCOPE), the UMAP in the latent space is not really convincing, as the cell-types are barely overlapping.
What do you think could be causing the issue?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/525a5/525a5990b3b9e99e4e7047ddf5665050f65aaa16" alt="ENVI_version_comparison"
Thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: