Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

different experiment settings between training end to end scan2cap and the fixed-detector scan2cap #19

Open
ch3cook-fdu opened this issue Mar 27, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@ch3cook-fdu
Copy link

In end-to-end scan2cap, the relation graph's input is the origin proposals without nms. However in fixed-detector scan2cap, the relation graph's input is the origin proposals with nms. I think that's not a fair comparison.
I've performed experiments with pre-fetched votenet features without nms, and use train_pretrained.py to train the fix-detector's performance. The result shows that the fixed-detector one actually out-performs the end-to-end one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant