Is there any potential negative to using cached latents, besides VRAM use? #1401
morphinapg
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I don't know entirely how the latents thing works, so I was wondering if there was any kind of random seed involved when generating latents, because I would imagine using a new seed each epoch would result in better training for each image.
But if there's nothing like that involved in the process, then I would imagine the results would be identical, just faster, as long as your VRAM can handle it.
On the current version of the extension I can't even train without caching, and it's slower even when I do, but on the older version of the extension, it's about 15% faster if I use cached latents, so it's worth asking.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions