You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I guess it's not against Cursorless's philosophy to have more that one way to achieve something, because multiple ways of doing something emerge easily anyways. The way you think about a problem, and thus the way you'll tend to solve it, can be different, depending on the situation.
When I had the cursor inside the name of a called function and wanted to select the whole argument list, I thought of:
Saying "inside call". But "inside" currently doesn't support this. With support for it, you could semantically refer to the whole argument list in these cases (| is the cursor):
the_c|all(123, "foo", true)
the_call(a * (b| + c), "foo", true)
Saying something like "copy whole every arg call". "whole" (or "paled"/"cupped"/"spackled"?) would be a modifier that spackles the gaps between multiple targets to create a single target.
In another use case with a call with just one argument, you currently have to say "flash first arg call". But it would be cool if "flash arg call" would suffice in this case.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I guess it's not against Cursorless's philosophy to have more that one way to achieve something, because multiple ways of doing something emerge easily anyways. The way you think about a problem, and thus the way you'll tend to solve it, can be different, depending on the situation.
When I had the cursor inside the name of a called function and wanted to select the whole argument list, I thought of:
|
is the cursor):the_c|all(123, "foo", true)
the_call(a * (b| + c), "foo", true)
In another use case with a call with just one argument, you currently have to say "flash first arg call". But it would be cool if "flash arg call" would suffice in this case.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions