Skip to content

LF.7.1 + S:T572I (73, >10 Places) #2873

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
FedeGueli opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 11 comments
Open

LF.7.1 + S:T572I (73, >10 Places) #2873

FedeGueli opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 11 comments

Comments

@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

FedeGueli commented Jan 20, 2025

This was fromerly known as Branch 4 of sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals#2215
Initially we tracked just the T493C branch , then Usher added some recent sample without it starting directly from the S:T572I node ,as @xz-keg analyzed. this creates unfortunately the need to use a double query for this lineage one excluding the 493C samples and all the convergent appearance of LF.71. and the other the original T493C+ T572i query

LF.7.1 >> S:T572I (C23277T) > T493C
Double Query:
C6310T,C23277T,C8818T,-T493C,-A3398G, -C4068T,-C25006T,-C25671T,-G4354A,-A798G,-T20040C,-C2048T,-A3008G,-C583T,-C3828T,-G3939T,-6525T
PLUS
T493C,C23277T, C7869T
Samples:17
Places: 9 [ Slovenia, US, Sweden, England,Poland,France, Finland, Netherlands, Singapore]
Query for S:Q690P branch (by @xz-keg ) : C6310T,C23277T,C8818T,A23631C,
Samples: 14
Places: US (3 States)
Tree (updated on March 24):
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/hgPhyloPlace/subtreeAuspice1_genome_11e421_1e4f80.json?label=id:node_7153457
Image

IDs List ( with both 493C and 493T to avoid issues during designation eventually):
EPI_ISL_19658646, EPI_ISL_19664058, EPI_ISL_19666744,
EPI_ISL_19485019, EPI_ISL_19485035, EPI_ISL_19527136,
EPI_ISL_19550733, EPI_ISL_19575726, EPI_ISL_19624325,
EPI_ISL_19631425, EPI_ISL_19632487, EPI_ISL_19633180,
EPI_ISL_19646294, EPI_ISL_19646548, EPI_ISL_19650840,
EPI_ISL_19669981, EPI_ISL_19671470

@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title LF.7.1 + S:T572I (17, 9 Places) LF.7.1 + S:T572I (19, 10 Places) Jan 20, 2025
@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor Author

+2 in the non 493C branch one from Singapore the other from Portugal new country

@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title LF.7.1 + S:T572I (19, 10 Places) LF.7.1 + S:T572I (20, 10 Places) Jan 23, 2025
@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1 NY

@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title LF.7.1 + S:T572I (20, 10 Places) LF.7.1 + S:T572I (21, 10 Places) Jan 28, 2025
@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title LF.7.1 + S:T572I (21, 10 Places) LF.7.1 + S:T572I (27, 10 Places) Feb 12, 2025
@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor Author

10+17 gives 27 with new samples from Slovenia and Finland

@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title LF.7.1 + S:T572I (27, 10 Places) LF.7.1 + S:T572I (29, >10 Places) Feb 15, 2025
@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor Author

+2 IL

@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title LF.7.1 + S:T572I (29, >10 Places) LF.7.1 + S:T572I (27, >10 Places) Feb 15, 2025
@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor Author

27 total with new query with more -s

@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title LF.7.1 + S:T572I (27, >10 Places) LF.7.1 + S:T572I (33, >10 Places) Feb 21, 2025
@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor Author

FedeGueli commented Feb 21, 2025

33 now France Chile and a cluster with S:Q690P in Us

ping @corneliusroemer it seems 572I workjs very well with LF.7 backbone (without 475V though)

@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title LF.7.1 + S:T572I (33, >10 Places) LF.7.1 + S:T572I (39, >10 Places) Mar 1, 2025
@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor Author

39 now

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor

xz-keg commented Mar 18, 2025

There seems to be a S:Q690P sub-branch emerging. Query: C6310T,C23277T,C8818T,A23631C, 14 seqs

@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor Author

FedeGueli commented Mar 18, 2025

There seems to be a S:Q690P sub-branch emerging. Query: C6310T,C23277T,C8818T,A23631C, 14 seqs

Thx i was tracking it with A23631C,C26750T,T3565C that catches just 12 mainly in NY! . i will add it to the proposal

note that 4 of them have also S:S112P giving the folowing spike as result:
22N 31P 112P(3) 182R 190S 346T 444R 456L 572I 690P

@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title LF.7.1 + S:T572I (39, >10 Places) LF.7.1 + S:T572I (39, >10 Places) with a s Mar 18, 2025
@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title LF.7.1 + S:T572I (39, >10 Places) with a s LF.7.1 + S:T572I (39, >10 Places) with a S:Q690P sub branch (14, NY, NJ, CO) Mar 18, 2025
@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title LF.7.1 + S:T572I (39, >10 Places) with a S:Q690P sub branch (14, NY, NJ, CO) LF.7.1 + S:T572I (49, >10 Places) with a S:Q690P sub branch (15, NY, NJ, CO) Mar 24, 2025
@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor Author

FedeGueli commented Mar 24, 2025

60 (edited 34+26) , 15 with 690P ,

@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title LF.7.1 + S:T572I (49, >10 Places) with a S:Q690P sub branch (15, NY, NJ, CO) LF.7.1 + S:T572I (60, >10 Places) with a S:Q690P sub branch (15, NY, NJ, CO) Mar 24, 2025
@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title LF.7.1 + S:T572I (60, >10 Places) with a S:Q690P sub branch (15, NY, NJ, CO) LF.7.1 + S:T572I (73, >10 Places) Apr 10, 2025
@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor Author

73

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants