You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Feature/Problem:
One of the missing features on podman is the ability to fully backup and restore a pod, (its containers, volumes networking etc..) So I started meddling with creating two scripts to backup and restore from one compute unit to another (RPi). During this endevor I hit the similar issue as (#882) discusses. When creating a pod, the podman_compose.py that the distro I use
podman-compose --version
podman-compose version: 1.0.6
['podman', '--version', '']
using podman version: 5.2.2
podman-compose version 1.0.6
composes the pod name with the prefix 'pod_'.
ie
# podman pod create --name EdgeX
# podman pod list
POD ID NAME STATUS CREATED INFRA ID # OF CONTAINERS
62b91a43dd22 EdgeX Created 5 seconds ago eb13361f19a1 1
^^^^^
(happiness, exactly as asked for)
# podman image prune -f -a # just clear the decks...
# podman compose --project-name EdgeX --in-pod=true --pod-args="--share net,ipc,uts" up -d
# podman pod list
POD ID NAME STATUS CREATED INFRA ID # OF CONTAINERS
2d0fc7725b7e pod_EdgeX Running 9 hours ago a50058181c2e 14
# ^^^^
(Mmm,.. ok not what I asked for but it'll do)
This is all well and good since it's easy to spot a pod in listing output BUT when it comes to exporting it as a kube, things go a bit awry
This is apparently down to kubernetes rules around container names needing to follow the DNS hostname constraints, where '_' is forbidden, so it looks like somewhere in the workings a filter is applied to try and assuage the issue without erring out... silently changing the name caused me a LOT of confusion during debugging.
Proposed roadpath forward:
I dug around a fair bit but I cannot find a reason why 'pod_' was used as a prefix, other than possible convenience when listing running containers and pods in list output. Looking at podman_compose.py it really doesn't seem to have any other deeper function, so unless I missed something obvious, this can be changed to either [nothing], "pod-", or some sort of --podname-prefix option as I'm sure there are a plethora of scripts already written out there expecting "pod_" as part of the name. If 'pod_' is to remain as a default prefix it would be helpful for some guidance on how to avoid the kube DNS filter trap in docs.
I realise that with respect to #882 the --kubecompat accepted there is fine and all for getting the pod converted but I then have issues with the json config files referring to "pod_" vs "pod". It would be simpler to just avoid the issue in the first place by dealing with the initial podname prefix rename especially as there is no simple means to rename a pod once created.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looking around in the pull requests pile I see someone is accidentally addressing this #1080 (in the tranform function) though it looks like the pull request failed.
Feature/Problem:
One of the missing features on podman is the ability to fully backup and restore a pod, (its containers, volumes networking etc..) So I started meddling with creating two scripts to backup and restore from one compute unit to another (RPi). During this endevor I hit the similar issue as (#882) discusses. When creating a pod, the podman_compose.py that the distro I use
composes the pod name with the prefix 'pod_'.
ie
This is all well and good since it's easy to spot a pod in listing output BUT when it comes to exporting it as a kube, things go a bit awry
This is apparently down to kubernetes rules around container names needing to follow the DNS hostname constraints, where '_' is forbidden, so it looks like somewhere in the workings a filter is applied to try and assuage the issue without erring out... silently changing the name caused me a LOT of confusion during debugging.
Proposed roadpath forward:
I dug around a fair bit but I cannot find a reason why 'pod_' was used as a prefix, other than possible convenience when listing running containers and pods in list output. Looking at podman_compose.py it really doesn't seem to have any other deeper function, so unless I missed something obvious, this can be changed to either [nothing], "pod-", or some sort of --podname-prefix option as I'm sure there are a plethora of scripts already written out there expecting "pod_" as part of the name. If 'pod_' is to remain as a default prefix it would be helpful for some guidance on how to avoid the kube DNS filter trap in docs.
I realise that with respect to #882 the --kubecompat accepted there is fine and all for getting the pod converted but I then have issues with the json config files referring to "pod_" vs "pod". It would be simpler to just avoid the issue in the first place by dealing with the initial podname prefix rename especially as there is no simple means to rename a pod once created.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: