Labels

• 2 (Med Risk)

  Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value
• 3 (High Risk)

  Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly
• bug

  Something isn't working
• disagree with severity

  Sponsor confirms validity, but disagrees with warden’s risk assessment (sponsor explain in comments)
• documentation

  Improvements or additions to documentation
• duplicate

  This issue or pull request already exists
• enhancement

  New feature or request
• G (Gas Optimization)
• help wanted

  Extra attention is needed
• invalid

  This doesn't seem right
• QA (Quality Assurance)

  Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax
• question

  Further information is requested
• resolved

  Finding has been patched by sponsor (sponsor pls link to PR containing fix)
• sponsor acknowledged

  Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons
• sponsor confirmed

  Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
• sponsor disputed

  Sponsor cannot duplicate the issue, or otherwise disagrees this is an issue
• withdrawn by warden

  Special case: warden has withdrawn this submission and it can be ignored