Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QC in CLIMSOFT #699

Open
ruirie opened this issue Jun 13, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

QC in CLIMSOFT #699

ruirie opened this issue Jun 13, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ruirie
Copy link

ruirie commented Jun 13, 2022

Hello Team,

I would like to request more QC functionalities to be built-in in CLIMSOFT as found in R-Instat. This way, it will avoid the data transfers in and out of CLIMSOFT for QC, thereby reducing likelihood of errors.

Onesmus

@mhabimana
Copy link
Contributor

mhabimana commented Jun 13, 2022

@ruirie -Thank you so much to raise this issue,well noted. @Patowhiz can you please discuss @africanmathsinitiative/developers the possibility of integration of this feature into Climsoft and revert back to us?
@ruirie feel free to add more required functionality you would wish to see in Climsoft for potential consideration in future Climsoft development and release.

@Patowhiz
Copy link
Member

Thanks @mhabimana and @ruirie for raising this. I'll discuss with R-Instat team and revert back on best way to implement this.

@smachua
Copy link
Contributor

smachua commented Jun 13, 2022

This issue requires more discussions between Climsoft team and R-Instat team to see which QC functionalities that can be added on Climsoft interface. The initial purpose of linking R-Instat with Climsoft was for the users to benefit from the power of R-Instat while their data is still in Climsoft database. If it becomes necessary to build the same functionalities on both systems as it is the case in this issue then we have to agree on which among them,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants