You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for releasing the code.
I found out that the performance of resnet20 on cifar10 is not that good.
here is the script I use:
python main.py --config configs/smallscale/resnet18/resnet20-ukn-unsigned.yaml --multigpu 3 --name cifar10_resnet20 --data ../datasets/ --prune-rate 0.5
which achieves only 85% acc on test set.
the strange thing is that when I set the prune_rate to 0.9 which means I keeps more weights compared to 0.5, but I got only 50% acc on test set.
python main.py --config configs/smallscale/resnet18/resnet20-ukn-unsigned.yaml --multigpu 3 --name cifar10_resnet20 --data ../datasets/ --prune-rate 0.9
can you tell me if anything wrong in my script?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thanks for releasing the code.
I found out that the performance of resnet20 on cifar10 is not that good.
here is the script I use:
python main.py --config configs/smallscale/resnet18/resnet20-ukn-unsigned.yaml --multigpu 3 --name cifar10_resnet20 --data ../datasets/ --prune-rate 0.5
which achieves only 85% acc on test set.
the strange thing is that when I set the prune_rate to 0.9 which means I keeps more weights compared to 0.5, but I got only 50% acc on test set.
python main.py --config configs/smallscale/resnet18/resnet20-ukn-unsigned.yaml --multigpu 3 --name cifar10_resnet20 --data ../datasets/ --prune-rate 0.9
can you tell me if anything wrong in my script?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: