- May 5th, 2012 - started work.
- Horizontal strokes are slightly thinner than vertical strokes.
- Diagonal strokes widths fall somewhere in between, varying with the angle of the stroke.
- The rounded terminals and edges are not circular; they are slightly oval in proportion with the horizontal / vertical stroke thickness.
- Rounded terminals descend slightly below the baseline and above the ascender height.
- No tapering on strokes; all straight strokes are mono-width, ie. their sides are parallel.
- No longer true. I've tapered the joints on 3, 8, etc. and the counters on O, 0, C, D, etc.
-
We need to audit all glyph widths.
-
We need to audit all kerning.
-
Is x-height right?
-
Is the Cap-A crossbar height right?
-
Is the Cap-A crown radius right?
-
Is the Cap-A glyph width right?
-
When we use connectPathSegments to finalize complicated paths, do we end up with irrational segments? Should we modify connectPathSegments() to modify in-place adjoining segments with close (re: a specific tolerance) endpoints?
-
The Cap-A is bad.
-
The Cap-A is tricky.
-
The Cap-B is tricky.
-
The Cap-G is very tricky.
-
The Cap-J is tricky.
-
The Cap-K is tricky.
-
The Cap-M is outright bad. inverting the w isn't good enough.
-
The Cap-R is tricky.
-
Should the foot of the Cap-R leg flush to the baseline or rotated square to the leg?
-
The 2 is tricky.
-
The 7 is outright bad.
-
The 8 is tricky.
-
Fix the crossbars in the cap and lowercase z's.
-
The descenders are completely fubar'd.
- FIXED
-
The bdpq is bad.
-
The e is bad and adapts poorly to semiround/bold.
- BETTER
-
The g tail needs to be stretched.
- BETTER
-
the g italics are fubar-ed.
- FIXED
-
The x-height is probably too low
- BETTER
-
the s has severe problems, especially in bold. raising the x-height will probably help.
-
the t foot is way too curved.
- NEEDS WORK
-
the x tips should probably not be tipped.
- BETTER
-
the z diagonal should be thinned.
-
We need to compare various cross-bars and make sure they align.
- A, S, F, G, H, K, E, R, Y, P, B, X,
- Numerals too!, ie. 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9.
- etc.
http://www.myfonts.com/search/tag%3Arounded/fonts/?sort=sales http://www.myfonts.com/search/tag%3Around/fonts/?sort=sales
Interesting idea from: Albert-Jan Pool http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clothoid