suggestion to improve documentation

[vmarquet]

First, I'd like to say that this is a very good library, so thank you!

But I'd like to suggest an improvement to the documentation on the front page. It is particularly annoying to find an example (http://iamceege.github.io/tooltipster/#demos) that does exactly what one wants, but which do not explain how such a result was obtained.

It would be really great if, for each example, there was a button that would open a popup displaying the code used for the example (or a link to a playground like jsfiddle / codepen with the example code.

[louisameline]

Thank you! Good idea, I'll take care of it when I have some free time.

[magicmb]

I agree with the sentiments: A) this is a fabulous library and b) the documentation is somewhat lacking in terms of code samples.

Personally I'm not really from a development background and the thought of having to work out how to setTimeout(()=> {debugger},5000) inside the dev console to freeze the tooltip and examine the element to work out bits and pieces, before heading back to my own test environment to compare, not to mention constantly going back and forth between the Tooltipster docs as well as other documentation for other libraries I'm using e.g. FullCalendar, to figure out what is likely to be causing any issues encountered, then to read various github issues and searching StackOverflow etc before heading back to the beginning and starting all over again wasn't what I initially had in mind when I moved over from Tippy.js (also a good library who as it happens recommended yours) to Tooltipster.

However I am glad I did as I now have it working more or less exactly the way I intended and the thing that was bugging me before with Tippy.js (disabling dynamically generated tooltips post initial render) which I never really got around works nicely in your library. So it was all worth it as far as I'm concerned and I even learned a few things on the way.

The only thing I can think of in terms of improving this fantastic library would be to add a few code samples (especially '5. Use HTML inside your tooltips') as @vmarquet pointed out, to make life a little easier for anyone like myself with somewhat limited coding experience who might struggle with the documentation alone as it stands.

Again, fab library and thank you for all your hard work.

[louisameline]

@magicmb Thank you very much for the kind words. You're right, jsfiddles would be nice for people to see what happens. Right now people can look at the code of the demo, but it will be nicer with standalone examples.