Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

REVISING THE 3RD AND 6TH SCENARIOS DUE TO THE CHANGES AFTER CUSTOMER MEETING#1 #50

Open
3 tasks done
Ayhan-coder opened this issue Mar 5, 2025 · 4 comments
Open
3 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
in progress This issue is being worked on need review Work related to this issue is completed, needs a review to close it. new This is a new issue priority: moderate Needs to be completed in a week type: improvement This issue is about improvement type: wiki This issue is about the wiki page workload: moderate 1-3 hours per week

Comments

@Ayhan-coder
Copy link

Ayhan-coder commented Mar 5, 2025

Issue Description

During the initial preparation of user scenarios before the customer meeting, I misunderstood certain concepts. As a result, both the 3rd and 6th scenarios require revisions to align with the correct requirements and expectations.

Tasks

  • Revise the 3rd scenario.
  • Revise the 6th scenario.
  • Validate the updated scenarios against project requirements.

Estimated Time

6 hours

Deadline

09/03/2025

Reviewer Assignment

Reviewer: @yusufakdogan0
Review Deadline: 10/03/2025

@Ayhan-coder Ayhan-coder added in progress This issue is being worked on need review Work related to this issue is completed, needs a review to close it. new This is a new issue priority: moderate Needs to be completed in a week type: improvement This issue is about improvement type: wiki This issue is about the wiki page workload: moderate 1-3 hours per week labels Mar 5, 2025
@Ayhan-coder Ayhan-coder self-assigned this Mar 5, 2025
@Ayhan-coder
Copy link
Author

Can you review the revised scenarios? I've updated the third and sixth scenarios. Here are the links:

@yusufakdogan0, your feedback would be appreciated!

@yusufakdogan0
Copy link

@Ayhan-coder I think there is a problem with mentor persona and mentor introduction in Mentor Registiration Scenario. The explanation body is included in the header part. Also if this is the final edition I think it would be beneficial to add related requirements in the scenario body.

@Ayhan-coder
Copy link
Author

Hello @yusufakdogan0,

Thank you for reviewing the scenarios. I've addressed the feedback by correcting the mistakes and adding the necessary requirements under the acceptance criteria header. Could you please review them again and close the issue if everything is satisfactory?

Best regards.

@yusufakdogan0
Copy link

@Ayhan-coder I think instead of adding necessary requirements under acceptence criteria, referring to to requirements page might be better. As an example you can check here. However as I said before if this is not the final state of your scenarios not adding the reqirements section at all is also an option since we will do it right before the milestone anyways and it is possible that we might change some requirements in the future and updating them again in scenarios might be troublesome.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in progress This issue is being worked on need review Work related to this issue is completed, needs a review to close it. new This is a new issue priority: moderate Needs to be completed in a week type: improvement This issue is about improvement type: wiki This issue is about the wiki page workload: moderate 1-3 hours per week
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants