diff --git a/docs/exceptions.md b/docs/exceptions.md
index 5ff07781..4e221901 100644
--- a/docs/exceptions.md
+++ b/docs/exceptions.md
@@ -1,40 +1,45 @@
 # Exceptions
 ## how they work
- - introduce `except(args)` command that causes a thread to be marked as
+ - Introduce `except(args)` command that causes a thread to be marked as
    excepting, and provides `args` in a pipeline register for future stages
- - create two end "possibilities", marked with `commit:` and `except:`, where
+ - Create two end "possibilities", marked with `commit:` and `except:`, where
    you have to be in a commit block to release locks. Except blocks have more
    complex rules:
-   + things that are "in scope": `args` and anything from before the earliest
+   + Things that are "in scope": `args` and anything from before the earliest
      point an exception can be thrown.
-   + all held locks are implicitly aborted on entry
-   + you may acquire new locks in the usual way, but (for now) may not throw
+     -- can always start with _just `args`_ being in scope for simplicity.
+   + All held locks are implicitly aborted on entry.
+   + You may acquire new locks in the usual way, but (for now) may not throw
      exceptions.
-   + all "future" threads have their locks aborted
- - when a thread is marked as excepting, it still has to step through the commit
+   + All "future" threads have their locks aborted.
+     -- The "abort" method of a lock should essentially throw out _all_ non-committed updates / locks.
+ - When a thread is marked as excepting, it still has to step through the commit
    block so that previous threads have time to finish releasing their locks
  - As soon as an excepting thread gets to the commit block, it tags a register
-   so that future threads will not be allowed to enter (or abort their locks
-   immediately)
+   so that future threads will not be allowed to enter (essentially, we need to ensure that
+   _every_ stage in the early part of the pipeline is killed and doesn't enter the "excepting" or "committing"
+   parts of the pipeline --- the actual mechanism to do that is up for debate).
 
 ## What needs to happen:
-	1. modify typechecking for excepting pipelines to enforce the above rules.
-	2. emit code for excepting pipelines. This will involve translating a lot of the
+	1. Modify typechecking for excepting pipelines to enforce the above rules.
+	2. Emit code for excepting pipelines. This will involve translating a lot of the
 		implicit stuff about them into explicit things, like the calls to abort, and
 		a couple of registers that are used, such as the `args`.
-	3. update lock implementations to support an `abort` operation.
-	4. write a risc-v processor that implements exceptions
+                It also involves the tricky bits of making sure early stages are killed when an exception is handled.
+	3. Update lock implementations to support an `abort` operation. This operation should throw
+                out all pending updates (reads and writes) -- some lock implementations may need to
+		be modified to delay writes until "release" is called to support this.
+	4. Implement a risc-v processor that uses exceptions.
 
 ## Partial order on tasks:
 ```
 1 < 2 < 4
 3 < 4
 ```
-we could get started on an excepting processor early, but testing seems
-important.
+we could get started on an excepting processor early, but testing seems important.
 
 ## Sequential semantics
-the `except(args)` command acts like a jump to the except block, which is
+The `except(args)` command acts like a jump to the except block, which is
 otherwise ignored. This means the except block needs to necessarily contain one
 recursive call xor output, which makes sense.