We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I suggest we change this code to always return None (and remove the page pruning predicate from the source). Otherwise I predict that we'll end up with this field slowly bitrotting (aka stop working but not covered by tests)
I suggest we change this code to always return None (and remove the page pruning predicate from the source).
Otherwise I predict that we'll end up with this field slowly bitrotting (aka stop working but not covered by tests)
ParquetSource::pruning_predicate is no longer used after #15301
ParquetSource::pruning_predicate
so we should remove the actual field (while leaving the deprecated methods)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
ParquetSource::pruning_predicate
is no longer used after #15301Describe the solution you'd like
so we should remove the actual field (while leaving the deprecated methods)
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: