-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
flatten
should be single-step, not recursive
#13757
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
I want to work on this but saw a related work in the #13756 should I wait or simply convert flattern func to flatten one level instead of recursion? |
You don't need to wait, but you can. We should expect some conflicts, someone will have to resolve. |
take |
Hi @logan-keede, is it ok if I pick this up? |
Yes, by all means feel free to do so. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the bug
per #13706 the list functions are modeled after DuckDB1
per https://duckdb.org/docs/sql/functions/list.html#flattenlist_of_lists,
flatten
should flatten one level, not recursiveTo Reproduce
Expected behavior
Additional context
No response
Footnotes
i would prefer a more established point of reference with close alignment to the SQL standard, but this issue is not about this ↩
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: