Add MemoryReservation to batch splitting in joins #13003
Description
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Follow on to #12969 and #12633
In #12633 @mhilton noted that joins sometimes generate giant record batches which causes issues. @alihan-synnada fixed this in #12969 but internally sometimes the joins still generate giant output batches.
As @mhilton says in #12969 (comment)
Unfortunately this doesn't address the actual problem with creating giant batches, which is they require a lot of memory and that memory isn't accounted for in any MemoryPool. Wiring a MemoryReservation into BatchSplitter would probably be enough to address this though.
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like the memory accounting to take into account the large output batch
Describe alternatives you've considered
Wiring a MemoryReservation into BatchSplitter would probably be enough to address
Additional context
No response