You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, never hear of this before.
Could you please help me understand what exactly you would envision adding/changing in Units.NET to establish a relationship?
I looked quickly and it seems to be trying to solve the same problem as UnitNet. But it's a specification not an implementation. Maybe some interesting concept could be grabbed from it. But I don't see UnitNet as an implementation of QUDT. Would be from what I see a major undertaking.
I have, a while ago, looked into some of the major ontologies (here's the review paper I have bookmarked).
In terms of "stealing-from" - I remember the term measurement scale which I quite liked - here's the related discussion.
Also- as part of some future v5, I've suggested extending the JSON definitions with (optional) links to existing ontological references.
I don't know exactly how this works but I'm guessing there is a use case somewhere for (de)serializing rdf, provided that the reference exists in the UnitInfo.
However I'm yet to discover a single hello world example that communicates with something like a sparql endpoint (such as wiki-data, or even a local store), using anything remotely resembling a POCO (assuming to contain our quantities). If anyone has one available- please, I'd love to check it out.
Relationship to W3Cs http://www.qudt.org/2.1/vocab/unit ?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: