You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When having several robots, each in its own namespace it makes it difficult to manage the fiducial_slam (remap...). I'd make a pull request with a fix, but want to ask you how you'd prefer it:
Pass two NodeHandles (pnh and nh) to these functions. This way, if a namespace is defined and you declare the subscriber with nh but without the / the nodehandle will use the namespace: /robot_1/fiducial_map
Pass only the private NodeHandle, as it is now, but create all publishers from the private namespace, which will result in: /robot_1/fiducial_slam/fiducial_map
What is the preferable way in your opinion?
Thank you in advance.
Ivan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
In the package fiducial_slam there are several subscribers and publishers which use the root (/) namespace. Here are the mentioned lines:
When having several robots, each in its own namespace it makes it difficult to manage the fiducial_slam (remap...). I'd make a pull request with a fix, but want to ask you how you'd prefer it:
What is the preferable way in your opinion?
Thank you in advance.
Ivan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: