You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's a bit confusing that Int.random(0, 100) can return 100 as well, ranges usually exclude the second value. Lot more confusing that Int.random(range: 0..<1) returns 0...1. And inclusive range (...) is not supported at all.
(lldb) p Int.random(range: 0..<1)
(Int) $R24 = 0
(lldb) p Int.random(range: 0..<1)
(Int) $R25 = 1
Also Double.random() has a default of 0.0...100.0 while usually 0..<1 would be expected. Would you like me to submit a PR to adjust these?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well, while I agree with Int.random(0, 100) returning 0...99 may be conventional in a lot of frameworks (including C# ones etc) I would still would like to see it returning 0...100, because it seems more rational to me.
Int.random(range: 0..<1) returns 0...1
I would treat this as a library bug
Double.random() has a default of 0.0...100.0 while usually 0..<1 would be expected
It's a bit confusing that Int.random(0, 100) can return 100 as well, ranges usually exclude the second value. Lot more confusing that
Int.random(range: 0..<1)
returns 0...1. And inclusive range (...) is not supported at all.Also Double.random() has a default of 0.0...100.0 while usually 0..<1 would be expected. Would you like me to submit a PR to adjust these?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: