Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clean up landing position annotation annotation workflow #132

Open
edvinf opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Clean up landing position annotation annotation workflow #132

edvinf opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@edvinf
Labels
breakCompatibility Issues or pull request that delibarately break backwards compatibility enhancement New feature or request release2.0 Issues that must be solved before release of 2.0

Comments

@edvinf
Copy link
Contributor

edvinf commented Sep 20, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The current workflow for annotating positions to landings are confusing for users because it chains two proces-data-processes, and useProcessData needs to be unchecked in an interim process (DefineAreaPostion) in order to get intended effects from changes to loadFdaStratumPolygon.

We will:

  • remove the option 'StratumPolygon' from 'DefineAreaPostion'
  • add a corresponding option to:
  • -- AddPositionStoxLanding
  • -- SetPositionStoxBiotic
@edvinf edvinf added enhancement New feature or request breakCompatibility Issues or pull request that delibarately break backwards compatibility labels Sep 20, 2024
@edvinf edvinf self-assigned this Sep 20, 2024
@edvinf edvinf added the release2.0 Issues that must be solved before release of 2.0 label Dec 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@edvinf edvinf

Labels
breakCompatibility Issues or pull request that delibarately break backwards compatibility enhancement New feature or request release2.0 Issues that must be solved before release of 2.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@edvinf