|
| 1 | +# Unified Graph Analysis Report |
| 2 | +**Generated on:** 2025-10-15 10:00:54 |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +## Summary |
| 5 | +These are high-level counts of nodes/edges for each graph constructed during analysis. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +- Co-attendance graph (nodes): 126 |
| 8 | +- Co-attendance graph (edges): 1848 |
| 9 | +- Path graph (nodes): 6833 |
| 10 | +- Path graph (edges): 6832 |
| 11 | +- Field graph (nodes): 44 |
| 12 | +- Field graph (edges): 149 |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +## Degree (Co-attendance) Analysis |
| 15 | +People are connected if they attend the same meeting; a person's degree is how many unique people they co-attended with. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +### Top Nodes by Degree |
| 18 | +These are the people connected to the most unique others across meetings. |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +| Rank | Node | Degree | |
| 21 | +|------|------|--------| |
| 22 | +| 1 | AshleyDawn | 95 | |
| 23 | +| 2 | PeterE | 91 | |
| 24 | +| 3 | advanceameyaw | 87 | |
| 25 | +| 4 | CallyFromAuron | 81 | |
| 26 | +| 5 | Kateri | 81 | |
| 27 | +| 6 | UKnowZork | 79 | |
| 28 | +| 7 | Sucre n Spice | 78 | |
| 29 | +| 8 | esewilliams | 76 | |
| 30 | +| 9 | LordKizzy | 76 | |
| 31 | +| 10 | Jeffrey Ndarake | 73 | |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +### Degree Distribution |
| 34 | +How many people fall into each degree (number of unique co-attendees) bucket. |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +| Degree | Count of Nodes | |
| 37 | +|--------|-----------------| |
| 38 | +| 4 | 1 | |
| 39 | +| 6 | 2 | |
| 40 | +| 8 | 4 | |
| 41 | +| 9 | 6 | |
| 42 | +| 10 | 6 | |
| 43 | +| 11 | 8 | |
| 44 | +| 12 | 5 | |
| 45 | +| 13 | 17 | |
| 46 | +| 15 | 2 | |
| 47 | +| 16 | 5 | |
| 48 | +| 17 | 4 | |
| 49 | +| 18 | 2 | |
| 50 | +| 19 | 3 | |
| 51 | +| 20 | 4 | |
| 52 | +| 21 | 4 | |
| 53 | +| 23 | 2 | |
| 54 | +| 24 | 1 | |
| 55 | +| 26 | 2 | |
| 56 | +| 27 | 2 | |
| 57 | +| 29 | 1 | |
| 58 | +| 30 | 3 | |
| 59 | +| 31 | 1 | |
| 60 | +| 33 | 1 | |
| 61 | +| 34 | 2 | |
| 62 | +| 35 | 1 | |
| 63 | +| 36 | 2 | |
| 64 | +| 40 | 1 | |
| 65 | +| 43 | 2 | |
| 66 | +| 44 | 1 | |
| 67 | +| 45 | 1 | |
| 68 | +| 46 | 3 | |
| 69 | +| 47 | 1 | |
| 70 | +| 48 | 1 | |
| 71 | +| 49 | 1 | |
| 72 | +| 51 | 1 | |
| 73 | +| 57 | 1 | |
| 74 | +| 58 | 1 | |
| 75 | +| 60 | 1 | |
| 76 | +| 62 | 4 | |
| 77 | +| 63 | 1 | |
| 78 | +| 65 | 1 | |
| 79 | +| 66 | 1 | |
| 80 | +| 71 | 2 | |
| 81 | +| 72 | 1 | |
| 82 | +| 73 | 1 | |
| 83 | +| 76 | 2 | |
| 84 | +| 78 | 1 | |
| 85 | +| 79 | 1 | |
| 86 | +| 81 | 2 | |
| 87 | +| 87 | 1 | |
| 88 | +| 91 | 1 | |
| 89 | +| 95 | 1 | |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +## JSON Field Degree Analysis |
| 92 | +Fields are connected when they appear together inside the same JSON object; a field's degree is the number of distinct fields it co-occurs with. |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +### Top Fields by Degree |
| 95 | +These fields co-occur with the largest variety of other fields. |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +| Rank | Field | Degree | |
| 98 | +|------|-------|--------| |
| 99 | +| 1 | documenter | 11 | |
| 100 | +| 2 | typeOfMeeting | 11 | |
| 101 | +| 3 | purpose | 11 | |
| 102 | +| 4 | workingDocs | 11 | |
| 103 | +| 5 | host | 11 | |
| 104 | +| 6 | date | 11 | |
| 105 | +| 7 | peoplePresent | 11 | |
| 106 | +| 8 | status | 11 | |
| 107 | +| 9 | meetingVideoLink | 10 | |
| 108 | +| 10 | meetingInfo | 9 | |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +### Degree Distribution |
| 111 | +How many fields have each degree (number of distinct co-occurring fields). |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +| Degree | Count of Fields | |
| 114 | +|--------|------------------| |
| 115 | +| 1 | 2 | |
| 116 | +| 2 | 2 | |
| 117 | +| 3 | 9 | |
| 118 | +| 4 | 4 | |
| 119 | +| 5 | 1 | |
| 120 | +| 7 | 2 | |
| 121 | +| 8 | 3 | |
| 122 | +| 9 | 12 | |
| 123 | +| 10 | 1 | |
| 124 | +| 11 | 8 | |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +## JSON Path Structure Analysis |
| 127 | +Each JSON path represents a unique nested route (keys/array indices); depth shows how deeply information is nested. |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +- Total Unique Paths: 6832 |
| 130 | +- Maximum Depth: 6 |
| 131 | +- Average Depth: 4.20 |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +### Deepest JSON Paths (sample) |
| 134 | +The deepest examples indicate where the data structure is most nested. |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | +- `[0].agendaItems[0].actionItems[0].text` |
| 137 | +- `[0].agendaItems[0].actionItems[0].assignee` |
| 138 | +- `[0].agendaItems[0].actionItems[0].dueDate` |
| 139 | +- `[0].agendaItems[0].actionItems[0].status` |
| 140 | +- `[0].agendaItems[0].decisionItems[0].decision` |
| 141 | +- `[0].agendaItems[0].decisionItems[0].effect` |
| 142 | +- `[0].agendaItems[0].decisionItems[1].decision` |
| 143 | +- `[0].agendaItems[0].decisionItems[1].rationale` |
| 144 | +- `[0].agendaItems[0].decisionItems[1].effect` |
| 145 | +- `[0].agendaItems[0].decisionItems[2].decision` |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +### Most Common Parent Paths |
| 148 | +Parents that appear most often, suggesting common structural hubs. |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | +| Rank | Parent Path | Count | |
| 151 | +|------|-------------|-------| |
| 152 | +| 1 | `[12].agendaItems[0]` | 26 | |
| 153 | +| 2 | `[2].agendaItems[0]` | 21 | |
| 154 | +| 3 | `[10].agendaItems[0]` | 21 | |
| 155 | +| 4 | `[7].agendaItems[0]` | 19 | |
| 156 | +| 5 | `[17].agendaItems[0]` | 19 | |
| 157 | +| 6 | `[22].meetingInfo` | 19 | |
| 158 | +| 7 | `[23].meetingInfo` | 19 | |
| 159 | +| 8 | `[101].agendaItems[0]` | 19 | |
| 160 | +| 9 | `[11].agendaItems[0]` | 18 | |
| 161 | +| 10 | `[37].agendaItems[0]` | 18 | |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +## Field Centrality (Co-occurrence) |
| 164 | +Centrality scores highlight fields that are well-connected (degree), act as bridges (betweenness), are close to others (closeness), or connect to other influential fields (eigenvector). |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +| Rank | Field | Degree | Betweenness | Closeness | Eigenvector | |
| 167 | +|------|-------|--------|-------------|-----------|------------| |
| 168 | +| 1 | documenter | 0.256 | 0.001 | 0.256 | 0.309 | |
| 169 | +| 2 | typeOfMeeting | 0.256 | 0.001 | 0.256 | 0.309 | |
| 170 | +| 3 | purpose | 0.256 | 0.001 | 0.256 | 0.309 | |
| 171 | +| 4 | workingDocs | 0.256 | 0.001 | 0.256 | 0.309 | |
| 172 | +| 5 | host | 0.256 | 0.001 | 0.256 | 0.309 | |
| 173 | +| 6 | date | 0.256 | 0.001 | 0.256 | 0.309 | |
| 174 | +| 7 | peoplePresent | 0.256 | 0.001 | 0.256 | 0.309 | |
| 175 | +| 8 | status | 0.256 | 0.030 | 0.256 | 0.000 | |
| 176 | +| 9 | meetingVideoLink | 0.233 | 0.000 | 0.234 | 0.290 | |
| 177 | +| 10 | meetingInfo | 0.209 | 0.000 | 0.209 | 0.000 | |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +## Clustering (Field Co-occurrence Graph) |
| 180 | +Clustering measures how tightly a field's neighbors are connected to each other (higher means more triads). |
| 181 | + |
| 182 | +- Average Clustering Coefficient: 0.882 |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | +### Top Nodes by Clustering Coefficient |
| 185 | +Fields whose immediate neighborhoods are most tightly interlinked. |
| 186 | + |
| 187 | +| Rank | Field | Clustering | |
| 188 | +|------|-------|------------| |
| 189 | +| 1 | meetingInfo | 1.000 | |
| 190 | +| 2 | tags | 1.000 | |
| 191 | +| 3 | canceledSummary | 1.000 | |
| 192 | +| 4 | workgroup_id | 1.000 | |
| 193 | +| 5 | workgroup | 1.000 | |
| 194 | +| 6 | agendaItems | 1.000 | |
| 195 | +| 7 | type | 1.000 | |
| 196 | +| 8 | noSummaryGiven | 1.000 | |
| 197 | +| 9 | timestampedVideo | 1.000 | |
| 198 | +| 10 | dueDate | 1.000 | |
| 199 | + |
| 200 | +## Connected Components (Field Co-occurrence Graph) |
| 201 | +Components are groups of fields that are all reachable from each other; multiple components suggest separate substructures. |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +- Number of Components: 6 |
| 204 | +- Component Sizes (top 10): [12, 12, 10, 4, 4, 2] |
| 205 | +- Sample of Largest Component Nodes (top 10): |
| 206 | + - timestampedVideo |
| 207 | + - documenter |
| 208 | + - otherMediaLink |
| 209 | + - mediaLink |
| 210 | + - typeOfMeeting |
| 211 | + - peoplePresent |
| 212 | + - workingDocs |
| 213 | + - host |
| 214 | + - date |
| 215 | + - miroBoardLink |
| 216 | + |
0 commit comments