Skip to content

Query - assigning metadata in DITA #203

@mhGLEIF

Description

@mhGLEIF

"you should not feel locked into using them specifically for audience, platform, or product filtering"

http://www.learningdita.com/topic/lc_conditions_filtering_attributes/

Is it really best practice to "bend" the definitions of these (already very broad) categories?

Given the fact that there's also otherprops which presumably means "anything not fitting audience, platform, or product", shouldn't best practice be more like:

"Try to use these as consistently as possible and if audience, platform, or product don't fit, use otherprops or custom properties".

Otherwise the re-usability of that metadata will be affected, maybe even removed?

About the content of the attributes: should best practice be to have some kind of structured lists? E.g. products/platforms might include "family" of products/platforms, release date and/or version number; audience codes might be based on international standard codes e.g. ISO countries, IANA language codes etc. etc.?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions