You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug π
Hello,
This is regarding a discrepancy that I have noticed while using the Surrogates.jl RTEA optimizer.
The mutated solutions according to lines: 1882 and 1883 are labelled as βx_newβ and βy_newβ. But when they are added back to the surrogate model, they are labelled as βnew_xβ and βnew_y.β Is this a mistake, or have I got it completely wrong?
Expected behavior
I believe
add_point!(surrRTEA, new_x, new_y)
should be changed to:
add_point!(surrRTEA, x_new, y_new)
Describe the bug π
Hello,
This is regarding a discrepancy that I have noticed while using the Surrogates.jl RTEA optimizer.
The mutated solutions according to lines: 1882 and 1883 are labelled as βx_newβ and βy_newβ. But when they are added back to the surrogate model, they are labelled as βnew_xβ and βnew_y.β Is this a mistake, or have I got it completely wrong?
Expected behavior
I believe
add_point!(surrRTEA, new_x, new_y)
should be changed to:
add_point!(surrRTEA, x_new, y_new)
using Pkg; Pkg.status()
versioninfo()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: