You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think pycodestyle should handle this in a relaxed way, and allow for an extra indentation level for dictionary values (after : on the previous line).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm not convinced this will make people happy. As was pointed out in the peps repo, this seems to be a fringe issue. It's not apparent that the added complexity of allowing for this will result in a happier group of users. In fact, allowing this may seem more like a regression than not to some. I'd be happy to review a PR that makes this less strict here without regressing the rest of the check.
Currently pycodestyle will complain about the following:
We are about to change this in Vimjas/vim-python-pep8-indent#61, and there has been some discussion in python/peps#113 - resulting in keeping this out of PEP8 itself (i.e. undefined).
I think pycodestyle should handle this in a relaxed way, and allow for an extra indentation level for dictionary values (after
:
on the previous line).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: