You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I use command pigeon report test_classification.filtered_lite_classification.txt test.saturation.txt, getting test.saturation.txt bellow:
Then, I figure out that the genes number is same with 7th column in test_classification.filtered_lite_classification.txt, but the isoform is not with 1th column.
And the isoform is same with the total_unique_transcripts in test_classification.filtered.report.json. just FSM+ISM > total_unique_transcripts, Your support team also mentioned that the total_uniq_transctipts is not correct in smrtlink v13.1 I used here.
Is the isoform stat method special, or uncorret ?
Best wishes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
suyanan
changed the title
pigeon report terminated and isoform number uncorrect
pigeon isoform number uncorrect
Dec 13, 2024
I see this as well. The max number of unique genes (known and novel) reported in the isoseq_saturation.txt file matches the pigeon_filtered_classification file. But the max number of unique transcripts is much lower than the total number of rows in the pigeon_filtered_classification file. This is using the GUI workflow for SmrtLink 25.1 default settings, pooled samples
Hi,
I use command
![f5ec7d7cda8661cd961a489c33badc7](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/16696416/395080545-10b41b0d-421e-4069-8032-b0aed1e57982.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.8Q_A6F6AvRDTbhi_I5g5Mid5p3pxLGNjd9BPTFuXBU8)
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/16696416/395080358-608b1a2a-4756-4f7e-8884-9efe31042177.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.T0O8SaJt8xbDZut9hA5T9YmGPNfI0nuBc-voDU6uRjY)
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/16696416/395087331-99059de9-0b90-4a09-861e-b9458f0f70c0.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.dT9Ec4-bjvJ2TDNLGyNeHmF9YpPRvOFv0dvh8Madaow)
pigeon report test_classification.filtered_lite_classification.txt test.saturation.txt
, getting test.saturation.txt bellow:Then, I figure out that the genes number is same with 7th column in test_classification.filtered_lite_classification.txt, but the isoform is not with 1th column.
And the isoform is same with the total_unique_transcripts in test_classification.filtered.report.json. just FSM+ISM > total_unique_transcripts, Your support team also mentioned that the total_uniq_transctipts is not correct in smrtlink v13.1 I used here.
Is the isoform stat method special, or uncorret ?
Best wishes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: